Sunday, February 25, 2018

Collecting and Saving Information: Diigo vs. Pinterest LIS568

Something I never truly spent time thinking about is the idea of gathering and storing information accessed on the internet, specifically the benefits of doing such collecting.  As we all know, the internet is such a vast tool.  The amount of information that society is sifting through on a daily basis is unfathomable.  Now, something to think about is whether or not you want to try to make your time (and your student’s time) efficient while “surfing,” or you are fine continuing your mindless browsing.  I personally have found it very beneficial to start organizing quality information, that information that is helpful to my profession.  Don't get me wrong, I still have mindless “surfing” moments.  Although, they tend to be less and less these days.  My point is that I have had countless times that I needed some idea for a project, resources for my students, resources for myself, etc. in which I turn to the internet for assistance.  There has been many times that I have had to go back through my search history to try and find a certain website that I discovered a few days ago.  The wonderful thing about such a vast resource as the internet is that it provides us with exceptional tools that can help with such organizing.  The power that these tools can provide not only yourself but your students as well is immense.  I present to you Diigo vs. Pinterest.

Let me first start by saying Pinterest is mainly image centered, whereas Diigo focuses around the actual website as a whole.  There are certain aspects when you begin to use information organizing tools, such as Diigo and Pinterest, that you start to appreciate more than the others.  Tagging, being one of those aspects, allows a user to attach keywords to saved material.  Thus, the ability to find certain information in the future becomes much quicker and easier.  Diigo and Pinterest both incorporate tagging into their application.  However, Diigo allows its users to attach tags to saved material, whereas Pinterest only allows its users to search for new material using tags.  Although, I suppose creating boards in Pinterest and putting certain information on relevant boards can be considered tagging.  With Diigo the home screen of your account allows you to view your saved material.  It gives you the option to search through your material by typing keywords or choosing tags that you have created.  Pinterest opens you up to a home page that has all different resources depending on the interests you choose to be informed about, not your saved material!  With Diigo you can access suggested material through a “discover” option.  Where Diigo allows its users to copy and paste content into descriptions of saved websites, Pinterest only allows you to add a description to the boards you create.

Living in a socially connected world, having the ability to essentially “socialize” on applications is important for users.  Both Diigo and Pinterest allow you to follow other users and be followed by other users on the same application.  Pinterest allows its users to send messages, easily search for people by name and by content, and comment on both saved (pinned) and unsaved material.  Diigo allows its users to simply comment on individuals’ posts that are in the same group as them.  You have to first create a group to search, invite, and slightly interact with others while using Diigo.  Both Pinterest and Diigo do an excellent job with being able save content found on others’ boards (Pinterest) or libraries (Diigo).  However, Diigo only allows such functions with others’ content when following those users, whereas Pinterest allows such functions with whoever.  With that said, creating a class group on Diigo allowing students to add resources throughout the year can act as a valuable resource for students to use during the year and possibly their future years as well.

Pinterest certainly excels in the social aspect of the application, however Diigo seems to trump its counterpart in the more professional aspects, you know those functions that make your job easier.  Diigo allows its users to highlight, comment on highlighted text, and overall annotate any content saved to the application.  Sadly, Pinterest does not allow for any such functions.  The closest function Pinterest has in its annotating abilities is providing its users with the privilege to comment under an image.  Both applications allow for a browser extension.  The extensions for both applications certainly provide a better overall experience for its user, as they simply make the purpose of both applications easier to accomplish.  However, I feel for professional aspects Diigo’s extension blows Pinterest’s out of the water!  Using Diigo’s extension on my toolbar allows me to save websites to my Diigo library, annotate the article as is, annotate any PDF I drag into my browser, annotate the screenshot of the website I'm on, and more.  Pinterest’s browser extension, on the other hand, only allows me to bring up all the images found on the website I am currently visiting.


Although both applications are used for similar purposes, they are actually quite different.  Overall, they both store and organize information found on the internet, but depending on what type of individual you are will determine which application you will enjoy more.  If you are an individual who gets easily distracted by images, you will find Pinterest more of a distraction than useful.  However, if you need more visuals to help with your organization Diigo certainly will not do the trick with its wordy ways.  For me, it comes down to functionality for my personality type.  Pinterest simply distracts me, it is difficult for me to visualize its organizing ways, and overall too socially driven.  Diigo provides me with what some might consider an archaic organizing method, but that archaic organizing method is extremely efficient with its new age tags!  Not only that, but the functionality of the browser extension is super useful for my profession as an educator.  I can easily highlight areas of text and make comments directly on web sources, as well as annotate any pdf or screen shot.  For the assistance Diigo provides me in the classroom, I would be silly not to use this on a daily basis.  Furthermore, I feel that Diigo provides my students with a resource that exemplifies the power of connectivity through a less distracting and overall more beneficial way.  From organizing to functionalities, Diigo trumps Pinterest.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Britannica ImageQuest LIS 568

As students begin to realize they cannot just simply take and use photos from Google without citing and giving the appropriate cre...